Meet The Experts
Sasha Latypova
Alexandra (Sasha) Latypova, MBA is a former pharmaceutical research and development executive whose expertise includes clinical development, pharmaceutical regulation, manufacturing and product quality. Her evidence examines the regulatory, manufacturing and legal framework under which the Covid-19 mRNA products were developed and deployed, drawing upon primary regulatory documents, Pfizer manufacturing records, legislation and other documentary material.
Latypova provides evidence that mRNA/DNA platforms are inherently dual-use technologies capable of both therapeutic and weaponised applications, and that Covid-19 injections were deployed as medical countermeasures rather than conventionally regulated pharmaceutical products. She presents evidence of failures in Good Manufacturing Practice, product integrity and regulatory safeguards, and argues that emergency frameworks removed or bypassed protections ordinarily applicable to medicines. Her central conclusion is that the products were developed and deployed through a military and security-led countermeasure framework and are, in her opinion, legally and functionally indistinguishable from potential biochemical weapons.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Dr Mike Yeadon is a pharmacologist and former pharmaceutical research executive, trained in biochemistry and toxicology with a PhD in respiratory pharmacology. He spent 24 years in pharmaceutical R&D, including as Vice President and Worldwide Head of Allergy and Respiratory Research at Pfizer, and subsequently founded and led Ziarco Pharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Novartis. His expertise encompasses rational drug design, toxicology, immunology and the development and safety assessment of new medicines.
Yeadon asserts that the Covid-19 injections contain multiple design features which would predictably cause toxicity, and concludes that these features demonstrate intentional rather than inadvertent harm. He identifies the use of mRNA, the selection of spike protein and lipid nanoparticle delivery as principal toxicity concerns, arguing that these may cause immune-mediated tissue damage, direct toxicity and effects upon reproductive organs and fertility. He further asserts that the products were inadequately tested gene therapies rather than conventional vaccines and concludes that their design was intended to cause injury, death and reduced fertility, thereby constituting, in his opinion, biochemical weapons.
Catherine Austin Fitts
Catherine Austin Fitts is an American investment banker and financial commentator, formerly a managing director and board member of Dillon Read and a senior US federal housing official, who subsequently founded the Solari Report. Her evidence draws upon her experience of government finance, investment banking and financial systems to examine what she describes as a long-running financial coup and the restructuring of economic and governmental power.
Fitts presents the “Going Direct Reset” as a fundamental re-engineering of the monetary and governance system, arguing that plans developed by central bankers before the Covid-19 pandemic were implemented during it to accelerate the consolidation of financial and political control. She connects this process with central bank digital currencies, digital identity and increasingly centralised technological infrastructure, describing the ultimate direction as one in which money, assets and individual economic participation can be directly controlled. Her wider evidence on plunder, sovereignty and “Mr Global” places the pandemic within a broader transition towards concentrated ownership, digital surveillance and technocratic control rather than treating it principally as a public-health event.
Dr Joseph Sansone
Dr Joseph Sansone, M.S., PhD is a psychotherapist with academic qualifications in psychology and clinical mental health counselling. His evidence has two principal strands: his own psychological analysis of Psychopathic Authoritarianism as applied to the conduct alleged in this case, and his presentation and analysis of the late Professor Francis A. Boyle’s expert opinion concerning biological weapons. Boyle was a professor of international law and drafted the US Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989; Sansone authenticates Boyle’s affidavit and records Boyle’s intention, before his death, to give evidence in this case.
Sansone presents Boyle’s opinion that the Covid-19 mRNA nanoparticle injections constitute biological weapons, analysing that conclusion against US, Dutch and international biological-weapons law and the alleged gain-of-function origins, genetic payload and nanoparticle delivery system. Separately, Sansone applies his framework of Psychopathic Authoritarianism to the case, describing an interlocking system of fear, coercion, censorship, conformity, institutional control and diffusion of responsibility. He argues that the alleged conduct exhibits the ‘Dark Tetrad’ traits of sadism, narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy, and that these psychological and social-control mechanisms explain how the programme was implemented, maintained and normalised across institutions and society.